Ministers will rethink Bill that could block stem-cell experiments

Tough new consent laws that would block cloning experiments involving embryonic stem cells are to be reviewed by the Government after a protest by leading scientists.

Baroness Royall of Blaisdon, a government whip, told the House of Lords yesterday that ministers would reconsider two sections of the Human Fertilisation and Embyrology Bill that would have delayed or even banned research into life-saving therapies.

A group of 29 biomedical scientists and administrators, including three winners of the Nobel Prize, wrote to The Times on Monday to raise their objections to the proposed measures, which they said would hold back vital sudies into diseases such as muscular dystrophy, Parkinson’s and diabetes.

As the Bill stands, it would require all tissue used to create cloned embryonic stem cells to have the explicit consent of the donor. This would deny scientists access to valuable banks of tissue from patients who had donated it for medical research but who had not explicitly given their consent for experiments involving cloning.

The Bill will also make it illegal to use tissue from children in such research, even if they have illnesses that are likely to kill them in the first years of life and their parents are prepared to give consent.

Lady Royall said that while the Government could not yet accept the amendments proposed yesterday by Lord Patel, the chairman of the UK Stem Cell Network Steering Committee, it would consider them fully before the Bill returns to the Lords for its third reading.

“I am very willing to take this back and reflect further,” she said. She added that the Government’s position was that explicit consent from tissue donors was needed for cloning experiments using embryos, but that it would think again in light of “the very strong will of the House that we should take this amendment and reflect further”.

She said: “What we’re talking about is where donors have said tissue can be used for research, but they have not explicitly said the tissue can be used for the creation of embryos.

“We believe the use of their genetic material to create cloned embryos or human admixed [interspecies] embryos is exceptional and requires exceptional consent.”

Baroness Royall added that the Government had also received advice from its lawyers that specific consent was essential under the provisions of the Human Rights Act as it relates to family’s and people’s private lives.

She gave a commitment “to take this [legislation] back to see if there is a way forward that is compatible with the Human Rights Act”.

Lord Patel said: “I don’t understand what human rights section forbids the use of tissue samples, cells and cell lines collected over many years from dying patients who probably died of these diseases, and who would have wished while dying that by donating their tissue it might some day benefit others.”

Lord Patel added that children with some muscle-wasting, brain and immune system disorders had a life expectancy of only a few years and that the proposed law would exclude these conditions from the diseases that would potential benefits from stem-cell research.

His amendment was backed by Lord Walton of Detchant, an expert on muscular dystrophy.

Lady Royall added: “No one can give consent for an adult who lacks capacity, and for the same reason I do not believe it is right to do so on behalf of a child who is too young to give consent.

“If a child is incapable of giving consent because they are too young, it would be wrong for an adult to do so for them.”

She agreed that the Government needed to review its position.

Source - Times Newspapers Ltd

To contact one of our specialist lawyers please call 0800 61 66 81, or use the contact details at the top left of this page.

 

Next Steps

Call our specialist lawyers, regardless of
your situation on 0800 61 66 81.

Do you have a question?

If you have a question about the information on this page
please> click here

Additional Information

Others in a similar position reviewed the following pages:

SIABackupSpinal ResearchSpinal Injury Network
 
Ou most popular resourcesTo visit our most popular resources click here
Why choose our spinal lawyers > Spinal injury claims
Spinal injury services > Spinal injury law
Spinal injury case studies  > Spinal injury lawyers
Spinal video case studies > Spinal injury lawyers
Spinal ResearchSpinal Injury AssociationSpinal Injury NetworkRegainMy SpineApparelyzedBack up TrustDogs for the disabledSRA - Personal Injury AccreditedLexel - Law SocietyBack up Trust
Family criticise doctors handling of spinal injury patientFamily criticise doctors handling of spinal injury patient
Doctors at Wrexham Maelor Hospital have been criticised by the family of a man who died following a spinal injury.Hilary...
Chances of spinal injury 'increases with high BMI'Chances of spinal injury 'increases with high BMI'
New research has found overweight adults are far more likely to suffer spinal injury through disc degeneration than those...
Man overcomes spinal injury to complete charity trekMan overcomes spinal injury to complete charity trek
A man who was told he would never walk again following a spinal injury has set off on a charity trek that will see him cover...
Apprentices create beds to help spinal injury patientsApprentices create beds to help spinal injury patients
Two recovery bed prototypes have been praised by Birmingham's Queen Elizabeth Hospital for their ability to help rehabilitate...
Prism glasses 'help boost spinal injury patients' morale'Prism glasses 'help boost spinal injury patients' morale'
Spinal injury patients at a specialist clinic in Oswestry have been provided with prism glasses that allow them to see around...